Academic discourse has fairly rigorous standards of evidence, because the outside community often bases their opinion and actions on the knowledge we create and propagate. As a student, you might find these rigorous standards finicky, but you want your doctors to know what is enough evidence to decide what your disease is and not make mistakes. You want engineers to know (and not just think or believe) that the steel and concrete used to make a bridge is up to the daily load of traffic over it. In other words, you don't want folks making critical decision to have slack rules of evidence.
Part of developing an academic voice is learning what rules of evidence, that is what types and amount, are sufficient for the discipline you are studying to draw a conclusion. Those of us in English might be able to construct Shakespeare's life from the scant pieces of evidence on which we have to draw, but you don't want folks using these same rules to convict you of murder.
Here are some words we use to describe and talk about evidence. Learn them:
- opinion
- hearsay
- authenticity
- physical evidence
- relevance
- germane
- authentic
- expert
- sufficient
- enough
- lack of
- sufficiency
- eye-witness
- primary
- secondary
- biased
- source of
- documented
- refereed
- long standing
- degree of certainty
- smoking gun
- circumstantial
- empirical
- qualitative
- verifiable
- quantified
No comments:
Post a Comment